Ted Nugent is a pretty committed supporter of the right to bear arms. In fact he got up in arms when a cub reporter from Arizona tried to interview him on the matter. The discussion went like this:
UP: How do you make rock n roll and conservative politics fit together?
TN: How old are you, Martin?
UP: I'm 28.
TN: Then you haven't the faintest fucking idea...[Rush Limbaugh] had a prescription drug problem for a period of time. But, in the final analysis, is Rush in the asset column or the liability column. Did he learn from his mistakes or didn't he?
UP: I don't know. I don't know him.
TN: You call yourself as journalist and you don't know that?
UP: I don't know him personally, I don't know where he is personally.
TN:... Martin, I gotta tell you, when I see you I'm going to have slap the shit out of you. I'll buy you a mocha, then I'll knee-cap you. Because that is so soulless. What a far-reaching fantasy.
...Martin. Did you go to college, are you in college, did you graduate from college?"
UP: Oh yeah.
TN: Did they ever tell you about the Bataan Death March in college? Did they ever tell you about how the trains lined up in Nuremburg in '37 and '38 and took people to Auschwitz, to the internment camps, and then ultimately to their death? Did they ever tell you about the Japanese emperor who gathered up Japanese little girls for the army to rape and torture and murder so they could get in the right frame of mind for war. My point is: In the absence of the most evil moments in human history you can pretend those moments didn't happen, so you can pretend that certainly no human would ever force another human to be unarmed and helpless. Unfortunately, there are people in America, there are people in politics, there are people in positions of authority, who want to forcibly unarm, and force in to helplessness, American citizens. That's what this is all about... None of the politicians who want gun control - they can't claim ignorance - they all know that forced unarmed helplessness is a guaranteed victim orgy. They know that. So, they can't claim ignorance, they are either evil to the core or just deranged. Either way, they must be stopped.
UP: Hmmm.
TN: Hmmm.
UP: You believe that anyone that believes [in gun control] is evil or deranged?
TN: Evil to the core or deranged. If you would force me to be unarmed and helpless I would have to do everything in my power to neutralize you... Peace and love will get you killed. That doesn't sound like a hippie. Good try, Martin. You've gotta tell me, I want the words, say "Uncle Ted is the best interview I've ever done." Say it.
UP: Uncle Ted is the best phone interview I've ever done.
TN: Well if I was there in person with my short shorts on then you'd say it.
Hey there Ann Coulter, did I catch you on the rag?
Now for the uninitiated interview means that the reporter asks the questions and Nugent answers them. However Teddy managed to turn the tables and bully the kid on to the defensive. Poor Martin got derailed at "How old are you/You're just some snot nosed kid aren't you?" Now that's a pointed question intended to undermine the interviewer's creditability and shake his confidence. The inference is that the reporter is inexperienced and doesn't know anything. Martin obligingly answers "28". At least he didn't call him 'Sir'. After that Nugent is fully in command of the interview; asking questions and making the reporter look foolish. The original question got lost in the shuffle.
"Are you afraid to answer my question?"
A more experienced reporter might have pointed out that Nugent was answering a question with a question. Furthermore the response question wasn't directly related to the issue. That's an old political trick. Maybe Teddy's picked up slippery habits from hanging around with Rush & O Reilly? If the reporter was more hard boiled, then he'd have asked Nugent if he was being evasive, or was just stuck for an answer. If they wanted to be rude about it, which would be in order considering Nugent's tone, then they might even reply "Oh about the same age as you were, when you used to be a rock star." Now gun control is an important issue, and Nugent has some valid points to make, but getting slippery with a cub reporter is just cheap.
Shoot off mouths, not guns!
Now the gun issue is certainly open to discussion. For one thing the right is enshrined in the constitution. "Liberals against the constitution" puts the left in a kind of odd position. Nugent goes on to point out certain historical cases where a defenseless population was preyed upon by the authorities. Unfortunately I doubt that we're so evolved as a species so that such things couldn't happen again.
The Patriot Act and 911 hysteria has shown us how easily Americans' civil rights might be stripped away if they are scared enough, and if their leaders are forceful enough. You might even argue that the right to defend yourself and your family is a basic civil right. This was the thinking of
Malcolm X, among others.
Let's not let this fight get sidetracked by clarity!
Nugent can be a surprisingly bright and articulate speaker for his cause. Unfortunately he chose to be rude and belligerent on this occasion. Perhaps he was tired of getting beat up on by people with and agenda, and saw a chance to get his own back. The result is that a chance to have a real discussion, as opposed to a political argument, was wasted. The kid obviously wasn't in a position to give him a hard time, so he might have chosen to explain his position instead of becoming combative. His tactics have backfired too, as 80% of the Internet is claiming he was on crack and comparing him to
Mike Tyson &
Billie Bob Thornton. So whether or not it's guns or people with guns that kill other people (who may or may not be armed), an argument over issues has once again brought out humanity's less evolved instincts.
PS.
Malcolm X on non violence:
"It is criminal to teach a man not to defend himself, when he is the constant victim of brutal attacks. It is legal and lawful to own a shotgun or a rifle. We believe in obeying the law."
"It doesn't mean that I advocate violence, but at the same time, I am not against using violence in self-defense. I don't call it violence when it's self-defense, I call it intelligence."
"If violence is wrong in America, violence is wrong abroad. If it is wrong to be violent defending black women and black children and black babies and black men, then it is wrong for America to draft us, and make us violent abroad in defense of her. And if it is right for America to draft us, and teach us how to be violent in defense of her, then it is right for you and me to do whatever is necessary to defend our own people right here in this country."
"I don't mean go out and get violent; but at the same time you should never be nonviolent unless you run into some nonviolence. I'm nonviolent with those who are nonviolent with me. But when you drop that violence on me, then you've made me go insane, and I'm not responsible for what I do."
"Last but not least, I must say this concerning the great controversy over rifles and shotguns. The only thing I've ever said is that in areas where the government has proven itself either unwilling or unable to defend the lives and the property of Negroes, it's time for Negroes to defend themselves. Article number two of the Constitutional amendments provides you and me the right to own a rifle or a shotgun. It is constitutionally legal to own a shotgun or a rifle. This doesn't mean you're going to get a rifle and form battalions and go out looking for white folks, although you'd be within your rights - I mean, you'd be justified; but that would be illegal and we don't do anything illegal. If the white man doesn't want the black man buying rifles and shotguns, then let the government do its job. That's all."
It is interesting to reflect that self defense enthusiast
Malcolm X was assassinated. So when
Ted Nugent says that "Peace and love will get you killed" it might also be true to say that "those who live by the sword die by the sword". While we're on the quotes
John Lennon once said that if people demanded peace the way they demand a new TV set, then there'd be peace. On the other hand if people wanted peace the way they want a new TV set, then they'd demand it. It's still the same old story, and the fundamental things apply, as time goes by.

Latest Gossip = Slap Egotists